![]() ![]() Of course, Apple would do our best to protect that key, but in a world where all of our data is under constant threat, it would be relentlessly attacked by hackers and cybercriminals. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks. Law enforcement agents around the country have already said they have hundreds of iPhones they want Apple to unlock if the FBI wins this case. But in the digital world, the technique, once created, could be used over and over again, on any number of devices. In the physical world you can destroy something and it’s gone. The digital world is very different from the physical world. The only way to guarantee that such a powerful tool isn’t abused and doesn’t fall into the wrong hands is to never create it.Ĭould Apple build this operating system just once, for this iPhone, and never use it again? But it’s something we believe is too dangerous to do. ![]() Yes, it is certainly possible to create an entirely new operating system to undermine our security features as the government wants. Is it technically possible to do what the government has ordered? Should the government be allowed to order us to create other capabilities for surveillance purposes, such as recording conversations or location tracking? This would set a very dangerous precedent. Second, the order would set a legal precedent that would expand the powers of the government and we simply don’t know where that would lead us. If we lose control of our data, we put both our privacy and our safety at risk. It would be wrong to intentionally weaken our products with a government-ordered backdoor. The passcode lock and requirement for manual entry of the passcode are at the heart of the safeguards we have built in to iOS. We built strong security into the iPhone because people carry so much personal information on our phones today, and there are new data breaches every week affecting individuals, companies and governments. This would make it easier to unlock an iPhone by “brute force,” trying thousands or millions of combinations with the speed of a modern computer. They are asking Apple to remove security features and add a new ability to the operating system to attack iPhone encryption, allowing a passcode to be input electronically. This has two important and dangerous implications:įirst, the government would have us write an entirely new operating system for their use. It would also add a completely new capability so that passcode tries could be entered electronically. The government asked a court to order Apple to create a unique version of iOS that would bypass security protections on the iPhone Lock screen. Why is Apple objecting to the government’s order? Answers to your questions about privacy and security This moment calls for public discussion, and we want our customers and people around the country to understand what is at stake. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand. The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |